Ahhh. . . aren't crackpot theories wonderful? Completely absurd, and yet there is just enough circumstantial evidence available to make them marginally plausible. These, however, are not crackpot theories. These are completely solid theories, with a good bit of solid evidence to back them up. Why, they are every bit as solid as any theory The National Enquirer has ever propounded. And so, without further ado. . .

NON-Crackpot Theories

Disclaimer: THESE THEORIES ARE NOT MEANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY. THE AUTHOR MAKES NO SERIOUS ATTEMPT TO PASS THESE THEORIES OFF AS TRUTH, AND RESPECTFULLY POINTS OUT THAT SHOULD THE READER HAPPEN TO TAKE COMPARISON TO THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER AS PROOF OF A THEORY'S VALIDITY, THAT IS NOT THE AUTHOR'S FAULT. THE AUTHOR IN NO WAY WISHES TO IMPLY THAT CHARLES DICKEN WITHHELD IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM HIS READERS, OR THAT THE PRODUCERS OF POKÉMON HAVE DIABOLICAL INTENTIONS, OR, FOR THAT MATTER, ANYTHING ELSE THAT MAY APPARENTLY BE IMPLIED BY THESE THEORIES. THE AUTHOR INTENDS NO KIND OF LIBEL, SLANDER, OR DEFAMATION TO THE SUBJECTS OF THESE THEORIES. THEY ARE JOKES, AND IT IS THE AUTHOR'S SINCERE HOPE THAT THEY WILL BE VIEWED AS SUCH.

May '00
<-Apple Blossoms My Work Understand->